In today’s financial environment, having access to emergency funds is more crucial than ever. Many individuals are struggling to cover everyday expenses, and overdraft privilege can offer reassurance to customers who require fast access to short-term funds. Consumers, especially those who use overdraft services, continue to show a strong understanding of overdrafts and the options available to them. Consumers would much rather have their transactions paid for than returned. In either case, the financial institution will charge a fee. In the last two years, just over half of consumers have needed immediate access to funds to pay their bills. Political leaders tend to believe that overdraft privilege only affects lower-income consumers, but consumers earning between $100,000 and $150,000 also need access to short-term emergency funds. This is not a matter of wealth, but rather of having access to available cash. For consumers with accounts at financial institutions, having access to cash when needed is crucial. The benefit of not paying a fee unless they use the service is the type of access they are looking for.

Half of all account holders will need help with liquidity at some point. Consumers can’t predict when they will need access to emergency funds, but they want to be certain that if a crisis arises, it will not have a long-term effect on them or their credit. More than 60% of overdrafts come from consumers who intend to use the service and appreciate the value it adds to their checking account. Consumers are looking for a solution without a long-term commitment, such as credit card debt or a personal loan, and overdraft privilege provides that to them. Having access to additional funds when a consumer is in need is highly beneficial, and they do not want to experience any reductions in their ability to use the service. Approximately 30% of consumers use overdraft services, indicating a sustained demand for this offering. It is crucial for financial institutions to provide alternatives within their framework, such as Overdraft Privilege, Line of Credit, and a transfer from another account so that consumers can manage their fees and protect their income. Additionally, a repayment program is available to assist consumers who are having difficulty with their budgets, providing them with extra time to repay their overdraft limit. Strunk offers Overdraft Privilege consulting services and the best software to ensure your Overdraft Privilege program is an ongoing success.

Strunk’s ODP Manager hosted software includes a standard suite of reports that summarize the information from the most recent extract file imported. These reports can be used by management and by daily users to analyze ODP Program performance and assist with program compliance.

The Summary Report includes totals for overdrawn and not overdrawn accounts, number of accounts by ODP Status Codes, and recommended totals for overdrawn accounts reserve by branch and product. A trend graph displays the accounts with limit, the used commitment, and aggregate privilege over time. NSF and OD Fees and Refunds are also displayed in bar charts. Additional overdrawn account information and reserve information is summarized in the Overdraft Detail Report and the Overdraft Aging Report.

The Overdraft Aging and New Accounts Reports show individual accounts that should be reviewed daily to determine the assignment and removal of overdraft limits. The Fresh Start Tracking Report allows users to monitor accounts with Fresh Start Repayment Plans. The Letters Printed YTD report allows your institution to track the total number of letters and which letter templates are generated by month and year.

The Status Tracking and Heavy OD Users Reports show accounts that do not currently have overdraft limits assigned. These accounts should be reviewed at least quarterly to determine if the accounts now meet the qualifying criteria to be assigned an OD Limit. Consistent review of these accounts will help maintain a high percentage of eligible accounts in the Overdraft Privilege Program.

The Utilization Analysis, Opt-In Impact Analysis, and LOC/Sweep Analysis reports focus on performance analysis.  These reports include a Branch Summary and Product Summary table. Monitoring the percent of accounts with overdraft limits and the percent of accounts opted in for Regulation E is very important to maintaining or improving ODP program performance. The LOC/Sweep Analysis Report allows comparison of the number of accounts with ODP to the number of accounts with other options to cover overdrafts, such as lines of credit or sweeps from other deposit accounts.

If you have any questions about reports available in hosted ODP Manager, please contact Strunk Support at support@strunkaccess.com to find out more.

In mid-January of this year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed a new rule to restrict overdraft fees charged by very large financial institutions (Those with assets over $10B). View the PDF of the Proposed Rule with Request for Comment here:

https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_overdraft-credit-very-large-financial-institutions_proposed-rule_2024-01.pdf

When the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System first adopted Regulation Z in 1969, it excepted from Regulation Z’s definition of finance charge any charges for honoring checks that overdraw a checking account unless the payment of the check and imposition of the fee were previously agreed upon in writing. The Board subsequently made “minor editorial changes” to this exception, (e.g., to reflect “items that are similar to checks), such as negotiable orders of withdrawal. Under the new proposed rule, Regulation Z would generally apply to overdraft credit provided by very large institutions unless it is provided at or below costs and losses as a courtesy to consumers.

The proposed rule would accomplish this by updating two regulatory exceptions from the statutory definition of finance charge. First, the proposal would update an exception that currently provides that a charge for overdraft is not a finance charge if the financial institution has not previously agreed in writing to pay items that overdraw an account so that the exception would not apply to “above breakeven overdraft credit”. Second, the proposal would update a related exception that provides that a charge imposed in connection with an overdraft credit feature (e.g., a charge for each item that results in an overdraft) is not a finance charge if the charge does not exceed the charge for a similar transaction account without a credit feature (e.g., the charge for returning each item). The CFPB has provided two options to very large financial institutions to determine whether an overdraft charge is considered above breakeven overdraft credit. A financial institution may calculate its own “breakeven standard,” charging a fee required to cover losses and direct costs related to the provision of courtesy overdrafts; or a financial institution may use a “benchmark fee” of either $3, $6, $7, or $14, determined by the CFPB by analyzing charge-off losses and cost data.

The proposed rule represents a pivotal development in consumer finance regulation and would have a negative impact on the financial industry and consumers. Overdraft protection has been beneficial to millions of consumers since its inception. Research supports the fact that consumers who use overdraft protection, especially those who use it frequently, value the service. Even the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) research supports this fact. Furthermore, the CFPB has access to consumer complaint data in its own database, showing that complaints regarding overdraft protection and fees are extremely low. Strunk believes that a regulatory agency essentially setting limits on fees that can be charged by a financial institution sets a very dangerous precedent.

At present, the proposal pertains to financial institutions under the CFPB’s jurisdiction – those with assets over $10 billion. It is unclear what the impact will be on institutions with assets of $10B and below. However, if this proposal is enacted, the possibility exists that it will be adopted by other regulatory bodies. Also, regardless of additional regulatory action, all institutions may feel “competitive pressure” to follow the standard set by the very large financial institutions.

For now, no changes to existing overdraft programs should be made prior to knowing exactly how this process will play out. When discussing Overdraft Privilege and the current regulatory landscape, Strunk always emphasizes two things:

1. If you charge a sustained or continuous overdraft fee today, discontinue this practice immediately. Strunk has never endorsed that practice, and it is a flash point for regulators.
2.  If you charge re-presentment OD fees, discontinue this practice as well and investigate the 24-month look-back restitution to consumers. This is an area where regulators have come out with clear guidance in the last 18 months and Strunk has previously issued recommendations to clients.

If your organization has questions regarding this matter or would like to schedule time to discuss, please contact us at support@strunkaccess.com or 800-728-3116.